Search Web 365Gay
 

  News  

  Entertainment   Lifestyle   Opinion     Sports    Logo 

 | Set homepage script- Works in both Netscape and IE 4 and up   |  Daily Email Updates   |  Bookmark Us  |  RSS Feed

Week In Review    |    Columnists   |   Your Weathe LGBT History

News

 

 

Today's Top Stories      Print Page      
   














Put 365gay.com headlines on your site/blog:


Disabled Gay Man Fights For Workers Comp. Benefits
by 365Gay.com Newscenter Staff

Posted: July 10, 2007 - 3:00 pm ET 

(Richmond, Virginia) A 48-year old Virginia man is battling the state Workers Compensation Commission for death benefits stemming from an accident that ultimately led to the death of his same-sex partner in 2005.

Thomas Edwin Dunnavant and Phillip Pettus met in 1980 and began dating. In 1997 they decided to live together as a couple.

At the time Pettus was working as a mechanic.  But in 2001 he suffered a serious back injury and died of complications on Christmas Eve of 2004. 

Dunnavant, who suffers from fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, depression and type two diabetes depended completely on Pettus for almost all of his living expenses.

But when he applied to the Workers Compensation Commission for death benefits he was rejected. 

"This case is about making sure that the rules are applied fairly to everyone," said Greg Nevins, a senior attorney with Lambda Legal which is representing Dunnavant.

"Virginia law broadly gives anyone dependent on a deceased worker the right to claim benefits; there is no 'same-sex partner exception' to the rule."

In turning down Dunnavant the commission discounted Dunnavant's dependence on Pettus saying that both men contributed to the running of their home and that because he wasn't Pettus' spouse, he could not be considered a dependent.

Lambda has appealed the ruling to the Virginia Court of Appeals.

"The Commission dismissively rejected the characterization of them as 'life partners,' and labeled them as mere 'housemates,'" Lambda argues in a brief filed Tuesday with the court.

Lambda also argues that the Commission also sought to deny Dunnavant benefits based on the review panel's conclusion that no "family relationship" existed between Pettus and Dunnavant, "even though there is no requirement in the (workers compensation) statute that there be a family relationship between a worker and someone dependant on that worker."

©365Gay.com 2007


Today's Top Stories      Print Page      





 


Help/Feedback
 Corporate   Advertising Information   Links & Newsbox
 Daily Email Updates   Wireless Edition    Set homepage script- Works in both Netscape and IE 4 and up

365Gay.com is a wholly owned division of 365GayMedia Inc. Distribution, transmission or republication of any material from 365Gay.com is strictly prohibited without the prior written permission of 365GayMedia Inc.